JSR
Docket No. NR78 83-14
30 October 2014
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Wavel Records
tL
To: Secretary of
Ret: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 aia ¢ Dec 13 w/attachment
(2) HOMC MMRP-12/PERB memo ata 20 Aug 14
(3) HOMC MMRP-50 memo dtd 11 Sep ié4
(4) Supject's naval recora
wn
&
5
3)
]
1. Pursuant to the provisions Of n,
hereinaiter yeferred to as Delite osure (1) wich
cable naval
+ for Zi
2, The Board, csonsisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Ivins and Spein,
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30
October 2014, and pursuant to ats regulations, determined that
should be taken on the
the corrective action indicated below
terial considered
available evidence of record.. Documentary me
by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval recoras, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
having reviewed all the facts of record
3, The Board,
pertaining to petitioner's allegations or error and injustice,
finds as follows:
a. before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
mh
(3), the HOMC Counseling and Evaluation
Personnel Management Division has commented to the effect that
Petitioner’s request to remove Gs sailure of selection tor
promotion has merit and warran
®h, In enclosure
ts favorable action.
CONCLUSION :
Upon review and consideration of
especially in light of enclosure (3),
injustice warranting the following corrective action:
RECOMMENDATION :
a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected so that he
will be considered by the earliest possible selection board
convened to consider officers of his category for promotion to
cwo3 as an officer who has not failed of selection for promotion
to that grade.
es inconsistent with or
tion be corrected, removed or
ecord and that no such
rd in the future.
b. That any material or entri
relating to the Board's recommenda
completely expunged from Petitioner's ©
entries or material be added to the reco
c, That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for tretention in &
File maintained for such purpose,
rt of Petitioner's naval record.
confidential with no Cross
reference being made a pa
of the revised Procedures of the
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c}
ecords (32 Code of Federal
Board for Correction of Naval R
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Boaré’s review anc deliberations, and that the
i e record of the Board's
e above entitled matter.
pore hor . frrtur
JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder
proceedings in th
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Reguiations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
auLuoricy of rercrence ia), nas been approved py the Board on
pehalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
. ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Feecutive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5915 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015S. In enclosure (3}, the HOMC Counseling and Evaluation Section has commented to the effect that Petitioner’s request to remove his failure of selection to major has merit and warrants favorable action. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of enclosure (3), the Board finds an injustice warranting the following corrective action: RECOMMENDATION: a.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3482 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of major he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 Major Selection Board, vice the FY 2014 Major Selection Board. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2015 | NR455 15
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7o1 5. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing her failures of selection before the Fiscal year (FY) 2015 and 2016 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Boards. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected so that she will be considered by the earliest possible selection...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10691 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference:(a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with “his Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 January to 31 duly 2007 (copy at Tab A). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Ivins and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 October 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8166 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness reports for 10 April to 23 July 2010, 20 December 2010 to 30 December 2011 and 31 December 2011 to 4 August 2012 (copies at Tabs A, B and C, respectively) and his assignment to the Body Composition Program (BCP) from 21 September 2011 to 17 April 2012 (copies of pertinent...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2815 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval recora be corrected by removing the fitness report for 25 February to 4 July 2011 (copy at Tab A} and the service record page 11b (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 26 May 2011 {copy at Tab B). The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Hicks and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5272 14
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 November 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. e. In enclosure (6), MIQ again commented to the effect that the contested entry dated 6 January 2012 should stand, but further commented to the effect that Petitioner’s request to remove the entries dated 14 December...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2570 14
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Koman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on & January 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosures (4) and (5), the Board finds the existence of an error and injustice warranting the following...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7531 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 June 2009 to 31 May 2010 (copy at Tab A). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Spooner, Swarens and Wilson, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2013, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9085 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, applied to this Board requesting removal of derogatory material from his naval record, specifically, two administrative remarks (page 11) entries dated 28 August and 1 September 2011, regarding his civil involvement charge of driving under the influence (DUI) of alcohol. The Board, consisting of Mr. Dixit, Mr. Sproul, and Ms. White-Olsen, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice...